Finding a way to help the fellows with their Ventures


Naomi Fein>>Fri Jun 18, 2010

 

I don't know how many of you reading this post feel this way but...

The fellows are awesome! They are young, energetic adults, with great ideas, who are very passionate about what they are doing. In reading through their projects online before they arrived, and getting to know them the first week they were here, all I could think of is, how can I offer them any assistance? I have never had an idea that is as innovative as theirs, what could I ever do for them? 

And of course that was a ridiculous thought! The fellows are very smart, and they are extremely creative, but similar to anything else that is new and just starting up, help is always needed.

I offered to help a few of the fellows (I offered to help all, by offering office hours for them, but I have started with a few). I have gotten to know Naomi Grumet’s project, the Eden Center, and started to think of models of how to build it up. I got to know Micha Kurz and his project, Grassroots Jerusalem, and suggested ways for Micha to use google apps in working with his staff and volunteers. I have gotten to know a few more and very much look forward to offering them any assistance I can as well.

You too can offer to help. You can give ideas to help build up their projects, you can meet with them and offer your time and efforts, and you could offer to help with their venture once it is launched. No matter what you can do, even if you don’t think it is a lot, it will be a big help. Plus, if you get involved now, you will be part of the start of making the Israeli and Jewish community one step closer to being better!

Just food for thought for your Shabbat table!

 

 

Innovation- things just need to keep changing


Naomi Fein>>Fri Jun 4, 2010

To be an innovator does not mean that one time a person came up with a grand idea and it was a huge success; to be an innovator means to constantly be searching and finding better ways to do things. It can be an original way that one thinks of to do something, it can be taking a method of how we do something in one field and applying it to another, it can even be finding a way to bring those that do together with those that need. The point is, that no matter how one innovates, they are always seeing need for improvement and searching for ways to make that improvement happen. 

The best example of true innovation is a school called Beit Issie Shapiro, located in Ra’anana, Israel. Beit Issie Shapiro started out as a school for 16 disabled students, in someone’s house, and today their work affects more then 30,000 people. Mr. Shapiro, who was from South Africa, had a friend whose daughter was disabled. He saw a lack in services to help her and decided that Israel would be the place to create the change his friends’ daughter needed. Though he did not see his desire for innovation come to fruition, his idea created the base for what now has become one of the most influential, both politically and educationally, organizations in Israel and even in other parts of the world.

Beit Issie has designed and offers an education system for children with disabilities that starts from the time of initial diagnosis (usually around 6-8 months). It has brought new ideas to better this education not only within it’s own facilities but to over 400 facilities around the world. Beit Issie has created programs at Universities to educate disabled adults, so they too can participate equally in the workforce. Beit Issie has built one of the strongest, most long lasting coalitions in Israel, of organizations, that Knesset turns to when creating legislation for disabilities; a coalition that not only influences the making of laws but the implementation of laws. Beit Issie has affected communities, not only in their physical structure, such as the Park Chaverim, but also the social structure of how people view those with disabilities in their communities. This of course is just a small part of the list of changes and affects Beit Issie has had.

At Beit Issie you will not only find an administration and staff that have not only found a number of ways to make Israel, and even the world, better for those with disabilities, you will find one of the only nonprofit organizations that has an in-house research center that is constantly searching for how to make life for those with disabilities even better. Beit Issie is an example of true innovation, and we should all learn from this example to make the world a better place!

 

Where having good HR practices could really help


Naomi Fein>>Fri May 7, 2010

         Last Semester I took a course on Human Resource Practices for nonprofits. The course did not focus on hiring, firing, and evaluation practices, that was just one lesson; it did not focus on employee manuals and benefits packages, that was also just one lesson; what the course focused on was the need to create an interdisciplinary team among your staff and volunteers to provide a better service for your stakeholders (the people you serve). Throughout the course, students expresses frustration; frustration for not receiving an education in what they saw as "needed" for someone to hire us. Though we saw the team building as important, we were not convinced our current or potential employers would also see it this way. No matter what the employers think, though, I have discovered that team building is one of the most important things any organization could have in in Human Resource Management.

 

         Nonprofit workers, especially in smaller nonprofits, often see their sole purpose as getting their job done; fulfilling all the objectives and goals listed on their job description. If their job is to build a program, they put everything they have into building it. If their job is to oversee the finances, they make sure they are doing this to the very best of their ability. Everyone knows a nonprofit worker has to go above and beyond, however are they actually performing above and beyond?

 

         I recently observed an organization, an educational institute. This organization, for the most part, employs teachers, Rabbis, a CFO and an office manager. Like most nonprofit organizations, it does not employ anyone with experience in managing human resources, or anyone even without the experience to at least try. The result of this situation is a group of educators who are so passionate about education, who have such great ideas of how to revolutionize the way they teach their students, but who can not actually make this revolution happen. In this organization, each person is on their own to "try out their ideas" and everyone is trying something different. This lack in a unified method for educating results in the students not receiving the message the school intends to send. The students often play "good cop vs. bad cop" with their teachers; the students seemed to have learned that pitting two disparate views against each other is acceptable; and the students don't seem to have learned how to respect the teachers, what the teachers have to teach, or even how to respect themselves. Had this school brought the teachers together, as a team, created an environment where each teacher could contribute his or her expertise, and together developed a plan for educating their students to get across their message, the school may have actually had a positive affect on its students.

 

         The management of human resources is not only about the management of benefits and salary packages or overseeing the hiring and firing processes. The management of human resources is about managing the human capital you have in your organization, the value that each person has to offer, and ensuring that the individuals who work so hard for your cause, are working together for the greater cause. As with anything, you are greater then the sum of your parts when all the parts work together.

 

 

Education: Who is to blame for the failures?


Naomi Fein>>Fri Apr 23, 2010

 

In 2003, as a freshman in college, I wrote a series of papers analyzing the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. This educational initiative was proposed by the United States administration of President George W. Bush immediately after he took office and was signed into law on January 8th, 2002. Following my research about education systems in America, the successes and the failures of the past attempts for improvements, and the intentions of the new law, I completed my year with a paper sharing my own critiques. I remember writing that NCLB, in my opinion, would do exactly the opposite of what it had intended, it actually would leave more children behind in school. NCLB required improved test scores in schools, however this would result in teachers having to teach to the test, and not to the child’s needs; NCLB gives parents the choice of moving their children from a “failing school” to a “better” one, which would overcrowd the “better” schools’ classrooms and possibly turn it into a “failing school;” NCLB required a certain level of quality in all the schools, and if a school did not reach this level then the school would be punished by receiving less funding the following year, instead of increased funding to help make the necessary improvements. These, of course, are just to name a few of my critics.
 
Yesterday I attended a presentation by Miriam Cohen-Navot, the Director of the Engelberg Center for Children and Youth, a joint initiative of the Israeli government, the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee and the Myers Foundation. The Engelberg Center is devoted to promoting the well-being of children in Israel; they do this by conducting research, which is then made available to the public, teach the public how to understand this research, and acts as a resource and a consultant to Israeli initiatives to make a change for the well-being of children and youth. Among the vast amount of research the Engelberg center has conducted, Ms. Cohen-Navot shared with us one initiative in particular that sparked my interest: an analysis of the changing educational agenda, specifically in the area of youth, aged 14-17, not attending schools. Their research looked at the dropout rates and disengagement rates between 1985 and 2000. The disengagement rates showed the percentage of students who don’t appear in the statistics of dropout rates because they are registered in school, and sometimes even physical attended school, however they were not involved in any meaningful learning. In their study, though they found dropout rates were fairly low (1.9% for Jewish Youth and 11.3% for Arab Youth), however 31% of youth displayed one characteristic of disengagement, 19% showed two, and 11% showed three. Further the study found that services for these school-aged youth started outside of the school, displaying a major disconnect between serving the needs of the children in a place that they obviously needed it and could have direct access to it. Since this study was conducted a special Knesset committee was set up in order to address these findings, and the committees work has caused a paradigm shift in Israeli education: a movement to the understanding that the responsibilities to fix these failings lies within the system itself, an idea foreign not only to the Israeli education system previously, but I think to other education systems as well.
 
Since my freshman year in college I have always had a passion for learning about educational policies and reforms and watching to see if they were successful. I am a firm believer in the “children are our future” and therefore we must properly prepare them for their futures; however one thing I have found is that many educational policy makers put a lot of effort into blaming others for the failures. Though I still do not hold a high regard for NCLB, one thought that crossed my mind yesterday was how NCLB and the Special Knesset Committee actually do just the opposite of this: they have placed the responsibility in the hands of the education system itself. Testing in schools creates problems for teachers in curriculum building and teaching according to the children’s needs, however it also holds the schools accountable for how their students are doing and whether they are engaged in learning what they need for life or not. Allowing parents to move children to better schools is a sign that the parents are allowed to hold their children’s schools to a standard of excellence and if that is not provided they can find it elsewhere. “Punishing” schools for not making improvements, though not completely logical when it comes to helping the school improve, is consistent with sending the message that the “school system must fix itself, or else…” The underlying message these two initiatives send, though not always carried out in a way I agree with, does finally say, “yes it is our (the systems) responsibility to prepare children for their futures” and it finally stops blaming everyone else.
 
 

Quarterlies for the first quarter of 2010


Naomi Fein>>Thu Apr 22, 2010

As part of PresenTense's commitment to transparency we would like to present to you our teams quarterly reports on what we did in January to March 2010, and plans for April through June 2010. In many ways it was a very successful quarter and we look forward to being able to continue this success. 

To find out how you can become part of the community work PresenTense does email deborahfishman@presentense.org. In the meantime enjoy our presentations!

 

 

What makes a good leader? A lesson from this week's Torah portion


Naomi Fein>>Fri Apr 9, 2010

By: Nate Fein     

It is well known that Aaron, Moshe's brother, was the first High Priest (Kohen Gadol) of the newly formed nation of Israel after the exodus from Egypt. What is not as well known is that Moshe had to force Aaron to take the job! This week's Torah portion begins with the Mishkan (tabernacle) beginning to be used for divine service. One would think that Aaron would step up, desiring some piece of the leadership - but we see that he did not. The Torah writes: "And Moshe said to Aaron, approach the altar..." (Leviticus 9:7). Why does Moshe need to do this? Why does he need to convince Aaron that he's the one for the job? A simple "Hey Aaron, it's your turn" should have sufficed, but we see that Moshe had to command Aaron to do this. It is strange.
 
A Midrash (Biblical interpretation, quoted here by the medieval scholar Rashi) tells us that Aaron was chosen for this position due to his involvement with the sin of the Golden Calf; Aaron was embarrassed by his actions and did not feel that he had the ability to perform the divine service appropriately. The Ramban, a medieval commentator, tells us that Aaron was mentally paralyzed whenever he saw the altar. Just thinking about the altar and divine service caused Aaron to become catatonic.
 
Taking this idea further, the Moshav Zakeinim (a medieval commentary from the Tosafist school) suggests that because of Aaron's hesitance he has been chosen. His hesitance to perform due to monumental failure, a feeling that many of us can appreciate, is the cause of his ascension to the priesthood.
 
This is a very important idea, that only a person who has been part of the sin of the Golden Calf can be chosen. Moshe came down from Mt. Sinai and found the rest of the nation involved in this act, thereby negating his ability to become the Kohen Gadol. In order to lead the nation - in order for the nation to connect to the service of the Mishkan - only a person who has been part of their story can lead them. We see from this event, that our past history should not debilitate our future - we have experiences that make us who we are and uniquely qualified for the future. A proper leader understands that true leadership comes from identifying with your constituency and using your faults as a springboard for the future. 
 
Shabbat Shalom!
 
Tags:

The PresenTense Jerusalem Staff Pitches


Naomi Fein>>Fri Mar 26, 2010

 

On Wednesday Simi Hinden, the Assistant Director of Community Engagement gave a course to the staff on “3 Tips for Effective Writing.” Her tips include: